Moises G. Coro vs. Montano B. Nasayao
- G.R. number
- G.R. No. 235361
- Decision date
- October 15, 2019
- Ponente
- Per Curiam
Philippine Jurisprudence
Search published Philippine decisions, open source text, and use reviewed digests when available. Metadata stays visible at every step.
Research Workflow
Reviewed case pages surface core sections before full decision text. If no reviewed digest exists, AskBatas shows source text without pretending generated notes are authoritative.
Review methodologyUse title, G.R. number, court, year, ponente, topic, or linked law.
Start with reviewed digest sections, then inspect complete decision text.
Move between cases, cited laws, related decisions, and legal explainers.
Case Directory
2,623 results
A court decision may be limited, modified, distinguished, or affected by later law. Read the full text and subsequent treatment before applying a doctrine to a real dispute. This library provides legal information, not legal advice.
Official source links, review dates, and case status stay visible.
The petitioners, along with William Ramirez (Ramirez), Robert Magaway (R. Magaway) and Lawrence Andrew A. Magaway (L. Magaway), were charged with violating Section 3(e) of R.A. No. 3019 under the information whose accusatory portion stated: That on or about the period 17 July 2007 to 05 December…
Read decisionThe COA summarized the factual and procedural antecedents as follows: As narrated in the assailed decision, the MIAA and the Aeroports de Paris-Japan Airport Consultants, Inc. Consortium (Consultant for brevity) entered into an Agreement for Consulting Services (Agreement for, brevity) for the NAIA…
Read decisionOn May 9, 2016, Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Roa Duterte was elected as the 16th�President of the Philippines. A key agenda of the Duterte Administration was the relentless national crackdown on illegal drugs. This prompted several human rights advocates to heavily criticize the strategies and devices…
Read decisionIn an Information5�filed before the RTC, petitioner was charged with Illegal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, in violation of Section 11(3), Article II of R.A. No. 9165. The accusatory portion of the Information states: CRIMINAL CASE NO. 13-298456 That on or about July 20, 2013, in the City of Manila,…
Read decisionThe Charge Petitioners Roy Hunnob and Salvador Galeon, barangay captain and barangay treasurer, respectively, of Barangay Dulao, Lagawe, Ifugao were indicted for violation of Section 3 (e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (RA 3019),�viz: That on or about the 30th�day of July 2007 at Dulao, Lagawe, Ifugao…
Read decisionOn September 30, 2014, petitioner Guido B. Pulong filed a complaint for illegal dismissal, non-payment of wages, 13th�month pay, damages, and attorney's fees against herein respondents. He essentially alleged that, in December 1978, respondent Super Manufacturing Inc., (SMI) hired him as a spot…
Read decisionOn August 10, 2008, Hadja Nihma Alabain (Hadja Alabain), her grandson Qamar Mujanil6�(Mujanil), nephew Munajin Alabain (Alabain), and farm workers Julito Maghilum (Maghilum), Ronald Francisco (Francisco), his nephew Robert Alviar (Alviar), and Francisco's son Jaivin Palces (Palces) were on their way…
Read decisionOn March 8, 2001, the CSC Regional Office No. 6 of Iloilo City charged petitioner San Felix with dishonesty for allegedly conspiring with and allowing another person to take, in his behalf, the Police Officer I Examination held on March 29, 1998.6�The CSC noted that the picture and the signature of…
Read decisionRepublic of the Philippines (petitioner) averred that it is the owner of a parcel of land situated in Alibagu, Ilagan, Isabela covering an area of 21,646 square meters, denominated as Lot 1, TS 1028. Since the 1960s, the Alibagu Elementary School (AES) has been occupying and using the said property…
Read decisionAccused-appellant Villegas appeals his conviction for rape with homicide. He denies the charge and argues that his guilt has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt. The pertinent facts, as stated in the Appellee's Brief (represented by the Office of the Solicitor General), are as follows: On x x x…
Read decision