People of the Philippines vs. Philip Mamangon y Espiritu
- G.R. number
- G.R. No. 229102
- Decision date
- January 28, 2018
- Ponente
- Per Curiam
Philippine Jurisprudence
Search published Philippine decisions, open source text, and use reviewed digests when available. Metadata stays visible at every step.
Research Workflow
Reviewed case pages surface core sections before full decision text. If no reviewed digest exists, AskBatas shows source text without pretending generated notes are authoritative.
Review methodologyUse title, G.R. number, court, year, ponente, topic, or linked law.
Start with reviewed digest sections, then inspect complete decision text.
Move between cases, cited laws, related decisions, and legal explainers.
Case Directory
659 results
A court decision may be limited, modified, distinguished, or affected by later law. Read the full text and subsequent treatment before applying a doctrine to a real dispute. This library provides legal information, not legal advice.
Official source links, review dates, and case status stay visible.
Appellant was charged under the following Information: That on or about the 12th day of October, 2006, at about 2:45 x x x P.M., in the City of Cebu, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the said [appellant] with deliberate intent, and without authority of law, did then…
Read decisionRespondent Sea Power Shipping Enterprises, Inc. employed the petitioner as Third Officer on board the M/T Samaria, a vessel owned by Avin International SA. On October 25, 2009, prior to the expiration of his employment contract, the shipowner sold the M/T Samaria to the Swiss Singapore Overseas…
Read decisionThe facts of this case are undisputed. On May 16, 1977, the Republic of the Philippines, through the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), hereinafter referred to as "Republic" for brevity, expropriated the property of respondents Cirilo Gotengco (Gotengco), Preciosa B. Garcia (Garcia),…
Read decisionOn December 6, 2004, the CIR issued Formal Letters of Demand and Assessment Notices against CEPHI for deficiency value-added tax (VAT) and expanded withholding tax (EWT). The deficiency assessments were respectively in the amounts of ₱465,593.21 and ₱288,903.78, or an aggregate amount of…
Read decisionPetitioners were the registered owners of a parcel of land covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. ST-27 with a total area of 134.895 hectares located in Bais City, Negros Oriental. Sometime in 1996, the property was placed under the coverage of Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program…
Read decisionThe petitioners are former employees of Jobcrest, a corporation duly organized under existing laws of the Philippines, engaged in the business of contracting management consultancy and services.6�Jobcrest was licensed by the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) through Certificate of…
Read decisionPetitioners are private corporations engaged in the pawnshop business and are compulsorily registered with the Social Security System (SSS) under Republic Act (R.A.) No. 8282,5 otherwise known as the Social Security Law of 1997.6 In 2009, petitioners paid their delinquent contributions and accrued…
Read decisionAfter her admission to the Philippine Bar, Atty. Salucon initially worked for the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) before resigning to be become a human rights advocate. She co-founded the National Union of People's Lawyers (NUPL), a national association of human rights advocates, law students and…
Read decisionGiven the intimate connection between this case and Jacomille v. Abaya, supra, we adopt and reiterate the summary of the factual antecedents rendered in Jacomille v. Abaya for the sake of consistency, as follows: The Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) is the primary policy,…
Read decision