Answer First
Primary Text
COMMERCIAL LAWS SUPPLEMENT
dominant position by engaging in conduct that would
substantially prevent, restrict or lessen competition:
(a) Selling goods or services below cost with the object of
driving competition out of the relevant market: Provided ,
That in the Commission’s evaluation of this fact, it shall
consider whether the entity or entities have no such
object and the price established was in good faith to
meet or compete with the lower price of a competitor in
the same market selling the same or comparable product
or service of like quality;
(b) Imposing barriers to entry or committing acts that
prevent competitors from growing within the market in
an anti-competitive manner except those that develop in
the market as a result of or arising from a superior
product or process, business acumen, or legal rights or
laws;
(c) Making a transaction subject to acceptance by the
other parties of other obligations which, by their nature or
according to commercial usage, have no connection with
the transaction;
(d) Setting prices or other terms or conditions that
discriminate unreasonably between customers or sellers
of the same goods or services, where such customers or
sellers are contemporaneously trading on similar terms
and
conditions,
where the effect may be to lessen
competition substantially: Provided, That the following
shall be considered permissible price differentials:
(1) Socialized pricing for the less fortunate sector of the
economy;
(2) Price differential which reasonably or approximately
reflect differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or
delivery
resulting
from
differing
methods,
technical
conditions, or quantities in which the goods or services
are sold or delivered to the buyers or sellers;
(3) Price differential or terms of sale offered in response to
the competitive price of payments, services or changes in
the facilities furnished by a competitor; and
(4)
Price
changes
in
response
to
changing
market
conditions, marketability of goods or services, or volume;
(e) Imposing restrictions on the lease or contract for sale
or trade of goods or services concerning where, to whom,
or in what forms goods or services may be sold or traded,
such as fixing prices, giving preferential discounts or
rebate upon such price, or imposing conditions not to
deal with competing entities, where the object or effect
of
the
restrictions
is
to
prevent,
restrict
or
lessen
competition
substantially:
Provided,
That
nothing
contained in this Act shall prohibit or render unlawful:
(1)
Permissible
franchising,
licensing,
exclusive
merchandising or exclusive distributorship agreements
such
as
those
which
give
each
party the right to
unilaterally terminate the agreement; or
(2) Agreements protecting intellectual property rights,
confidential information, or trade secrets;
(f)
Making
supply
of
particular
goods
or
services
dependent upon the purchase of other goods or services
from the supplier which have no direct connection with
the main goods or services to be supplied;
(g) Directly or indirectly imposing unfairly low purchase
prices
for
the
goods
or
services
of, among others,
marginalized agricultural producers, fisherfolk, micro-,
small-, medium-scale enterprises, and other marginalized
service providers and producers;
(h) Directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or
selling price on their competitors, customers, suppliers or
consumers, provided that prices that develop in the
market as a result of or due to a superior product or
process, business acumen or legal rights or laws shall not
be considered unfair prices; and
(i) Limiting production, markets or technical development
to the prejudice of consumers, provided that limitations
that develop in the market as a result of or due to a
superior product or process, business acumen or legal
rights or laws shall not be a violation of this Act:
Provided, That nothing in this Act shall be construed or
interpreted
as
a
prohibition
on
having a dominant
position in a relevant market or on acquiring, maintaining
and increasing market share through legitimate means
that
do
not
substantially
prevent,
restrict or lessen
competition:
Provided, further, That any conduct which contributes to
improving production or distribution of goods or services
within the relevant market, or promoting technical and
economic progress while allowing consumers a fair share
of
the
resulting
benefit
may
not
necessarily
be
considered an abuse of dominant position:
Provided, finally, That the foregoing shall not constrain
the Commission or the relevant regulator from pursuing
measures that would promote fair competition or more
competition as provided in this Act.
CHAPTER IV MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Section 16. Review of Mergers and Acquisitions. — The
Commission shall have the power to review mergers and
acquisitions based on factors deemed relevant by the
Commission.
Section 17. Compulsory Notification. – Parties to the
merger
or acquisition agreement referred to in the
preceding section wherein the value of the transaction
exceeds
one
billion
pesos
(P1,000,000,000.00)
are
prohibited from consummating their agreement until
thirty
(30)
days
after
providing
notification
to
the
Commission in the form and containing the information
specified in the regulations issued by the Commission:
Provided, That the Commission shall promulgate other
criteria, such as increased market share in the relevant
market in excess of minimum thresholds, that may be
applied specifically to a sector, or across some or all
sectors, in determining whether parties to a merger or
acquisition
shall
notify
the
Commission
under
this
Chapter.
An
agreement
consummated
in
violation
of
this
requirement
to
notify
the
Commission
shall
be
considered
void
and
subject
the
parties
to
an
administrative fine of one percent (1%) to five percent (5%)
of the value of the transaction.
Should
the
Commission
deem
it
necessary,
it may
request further information that are reasonably necessary
and directly relevant to the prohibition under Section 20
hereof from the parties to the agreement before the
expiration of the thirty (30)-day period referred. The
issuance of such a request has the effect of extending the
period
within
which
the
agreement
may
not
be
consummated for an additional sixty (60) days, beginning
on the day after the request for information is received by
the parties: Provided, That, in no case shall the total
period for review by the Commission of the subject
agreement
exceed
ninety
(90)
days
from
initial
notification by the parties.
When the above periods have expired and no decision
has been promulgated for whatever reason, the merger
or acquisition shall be deemed approved and the parties
may proceed to implement or consummate it. All notices,
documents and information provided to or emanating
from the Commission under this section shall be subject
to confidentiality rule under Section 34 of this Act except
when the release of information contained therein is with
the consent of the notifying entity or is mandatorily
required to be disclosed by law or by a valid order of a
court of competent jurisdiction, or of a government or
regulatory agency, including an exchange.
In the case of the merger or acquisition of banks, banking
institutions,
building
and
loan
associations,
trust
companies,
insurance
companies,
public
utilities,
educational institutions and other special corporations
governed by special laws, a favorable or no-objection
ruling by the Commission shall not be construed as
© Compiled by RGL
34 of 203
Use With Care
Definitions and exceptions often appear before or after this text.
Court decisions may interpret, limit, or apply this provision.
Confirm amendment, repeal, effectivity, and official publication.