Answer First
Primary Text
COMMERCIAL LAWS SUPPLEMENT
Section 36. Nolo Contendere. – An entity charged in a
criminal proceeding pursuant to Section 14(a) and 14(b) of
this Act may enter a plea of Nolo Contendere, in which he
does not accept nor deny responsibility for the charges
but agrees to accept punishment as if he had pleaded
guilty. The plea cannot be used against the defendant
entity to prove liability in a civil suit arising from the
criminal action nor in another cause of action: Provided,
That a plea of Nolo Contendere may be entered only up to
arraignment and subsequently, only with the permission
of the court which shall accept it only after weighing its
effect on the parties, the public and the administration of
justice.
Section
37.
Non-Adversarial
Remedies.
—
As
an
implementing and enforcement policy, the Commission
shall, under such rules and regulations it may prescribe,
encourage voluntary compliance with this Act and other
competition laws by making available to the parties
concerned
the
following
and
other
analogous
non-adversarial
administrative
remedies,
before
the
institution of administrative, civil or criminal action:
(a) Binding Ruling. — Where no prior complaint or
investigation has been initiated, any entity that is in
doubt as to whether a contemplated act, course of
conduct, agreement, or decision, is in compliance with, is
exempt from, or is in violation of any of the provisions of
this Act, other competition laws, or implementing rules
and regulations thereof, may request the Commission, in
writing, to render a binding ruling thereon: Provided, That
the ruling is for a specified period, subject to extension as
may be determined by the Commission, and based on
substantial evidence.
In the event of an adverse binding ruling on an act,
course or conduct, agreement, or decision, the applicant
shall be provided with a reasonable period, which in no
case shall be more than ninety (90) days, to abide by the
ruling of the Commission and shall not be subject to
administrative,
civil,
or
criminal
action
unless
the
applicant fails to comply with the provisions of this Act;
(b) Show Cause Order. — Upon preliminary findings motu
proprio
or
on
written
complaint under oath by an
interested party that any entity is conducting its business,
in whole or in part in a manner that may not be in accord
with the provisions of this Act or other competition laws,
and it finds that the issuance of a show cause order
would be in the interest of the public, the Commission
shall issue and serve upon such entity or entities a written
description of its business conduct complained of, a
statement of the facts, data, and information together
with a summary of the evidence thereof, with an order
requiring the said entity or entities to show cause, within
the
period
therein
fixed,
why
no
order
shall
issue
requiring such person or persons to cease and desist
from continuing with its identified business conduct, or
pay the administrative fine therein specified, or readjust
its business conduct or practices;
(c) Consent Order. – At any time prior to the conclusion by
the Commission of its inquiry, any entity under inquiry
may, without in any manner admitting a violation of this
Act
or
any
other
competition
laws,
submit
to
the
Commission a written proposal for the entry of a consent
order, specifying therein the terms and conditions of the
proposed
consent
order which shall include among
others the following:
(1) The payment of an amount within the range of fines
provided for under this Act;
(2) The required compliance report as well as an entity to
submit regular compliance reports;
(3) Payment of damages to any private party/parties who
may have suffered injury; and
(4) Other terms and conditions that the Commission
deems
appropriate
and
necessary
for
the
effective
enforcement of this Act or other Competition Laws:
Provided , That a consent order shall not bar any inquiry
for the same or similar acts if continued or repeated;
(d) Monitoring of Compliance. – The Commission shall
monitor
the
compliance
by
the
entity
or
entities
concerned, their officers, and employees, with the final
and executory binding ruling, cease and desist order, or
approval of a consent judgment. Upon motion of an
interested party/parties, the Commission shall issue a
certification or resolution to the effect that the entity or
entities concerned have, or have not, as the case may be,
complied with a final and executory ruling, order, or
approval.
(e) Inadmissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. –
The request for a binding ruling, the show cause order, or
the proposal for consent order; the facts, data, and
information therein contained or subsequently supplied
by the entity or entities concerned; admissions, oral or
written, made by them against their interest; all other
documents
filed
by
them,
including
their
evidence
presented in the proceedings before the Commission;
and the judgment or order rendered thereon; shall not be
admissible
as
evidence
in
any criminal proceedings
arising from the same act subject of the binding ruling,
show cause order or consent order against such entity or
entities, their officers, employees, and agents.
Section
38.
Contempt.
—
The
Commission
may
summarily punish for contempt by imprisonment not
exceeding thirty (30) days or by a fine not exceeding one
hundred thousand pesos (P 100,000.00), or both, any
entity guilty of such misconduct in the presence of the
Commission in its vicinity as to seriously interrupt any
hearing, session or any proceeding before it, including
cases in which an entity willfully fails or refuses, without
just cause, to comply with a summons, subpoena or
subpoena duces tecum legally issued by the Commission
being
present
at
a
hearing,
proceeding,
session or
investigation, refused to be sworn as a witness or to
answer questions or to furnish information when lawfully
required to do so.
Section 39. Appeals of the Decisions of the Commission.
– Decisions of the Commission shall be appealable to the
Court of Appeals in accordance with the Rules of Court.
The appeal shall not stay the order, ruling or decision
sought to be reviewed, unless the Court of Appeals shall
direct otherwise upon such terms and conditions it may
deem
just. In the appeal, the Commission shall be
included as a party respondent to the case.
Section 40. ‘Writ of Execution. – Upon the finality of its
binding ruling, order, resolution, decision, judgment, or
rule or regulation, collectively, the Commission may issue
a writ of execution to enforce its decision and the
payment of the administrative fines provided in the
preceding sections.
Section 41. Basic Necessities and Prime Commodities. – If
the violation involves the trade or movement of basic
necessities
and
prime
commodities
as
defined
by
Republic Act No. 7581, as amended, the fine imposed by
the Commission or the courts, as the case may be, shall
be tripled.
Section 42. Immunity from Suit. – The Chairperson,the
Commissioners, officers, employees and agents of the
Commission shall not be subject to any action, claim or
demand in connection with any act done or omitted by
them in the performance of their duties and exercise of
their powers except for those actions and omissions done
in evident bad faith or gross negligence.
Section
43.
Indemnity. – Unless the actions of the
Commission or its Chairperson, any of its Commissioners,
officers, employees and agents are found to be in willful
violation of this Act, performed with evident bad faith or
gross
negligence,
the
Commission,
its
Chairperson,
Commissioners, officers, employees and agents are held
free and harmless to the fullest extent permitted by law
from any liability, and they shall be indemnified for any
and
all
liabilities, losses, claims, demands, damages,
deficiencies, costs and expenses of whatsoever kind and
nature that may arise in connection with the exercise of
© Compiled by RGL
38 of 203
Use With Care
Definitions and exceptions often appear before or after this text.
Court decisions may interpret, limit, or apply this provision.
Confirm amendment, repeal, effectivity, and official publication.