Answer First
Primary Text
LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS CODES, CANONS AND RULES
confidence in their intellectual integrity and contribute
useful precedents to the growth of the law.
But the volume of reported decisions is such and is ever
so increasing that in writing opinions which are to be
published,
judges
may
well
take
this
fact
into
consideration,
and
curtail
them accordingly, without
substantially departing from the principles stated above.
It is of high importance that judges constituting a court
of
last resort should use effort and self-restraint to
promote solidarity of conclusion and the consequent
influence of judicial decision. A judge should not yield to
pride of opinion or value more highly his individual
reputation than that of the court to which he should be
loyal. Therefore, except in case of conscientious difference
of opinion on fundamental principle, dissents should be
discouraged.
18. Influence of decisions upon the development of the
law
A
Judge
should
be
mindful
that
his
duty
is
the
application of general law to particular instance, that ours
is a government of laws and not of men, and that he
violates his duty as a minister of justice under such a
system if he seeks to do what he may personally consider
substantial justice in a particular case and disregards the
general law as he knows it to be binding on him. Such
action may have detrimental consequences beyond the
immediate controversy. He should administer his office
with a due regard to the integrity of the system of the law
itself, remembering that he is not a depository of arbitrary
power, but a judge under the sanction of law.
19. Idiosyncrasies and inconsistency
Justice
should
not
be
bounded
by
the
individual
idiosyncrasies of those who administer it. A judge should
adopt the usual and expected method of doing justice,
and not seek to be extreme or peculiar in his judgment,
or spectacular or sensational in the conduct of his court.
Though vested with discretion in the imposition of mild
or severe sentences, he should not compel persons
convicted or accused to submit to some humiliating act
or discipline of his own devising, without authority of law,
because he thinks it will have a beneficial corrective
influence.
Judges imposing sentences should endeavor to conform
to a reasonable standard of punishment and should not
seek popularity either by exceptional severity or undue
leniency.
20. Review
In order that a litigant may secure the full benefit of the
right of review accorded to him by law, a trial judge
should
scrupulously
grant
to
the
defeated
party
opportunity to present the situation arising upon the trial
exactly as it arose, was presented, and decided by full and
fair bill of exceptions or otherwise; and failure in this
regard on the part of the judge is peculiarly worthy of
condemnation because the wrong done is remediable.
21. Legislation
Judges have exceptional opportunity to observe the
operation of statutes, especially those relating to practice,
and to ascertain whether they tend to impede the just
disposition of controversies; and they may well contribute
to the public interest by advising those having authority
to remedy defects of procedure of the result of their
observation and experience.
22. Infractions of law
The judge should be studiously careful himself to avoid
even the slightest infraction of the law, lest it be a
demoralizing example to others.
23. Inconsistent obligations
A judge should not accept inconsistent duties; nor incur
obligations, pecuniary or otherwise, which will in any way
interfere with his devotion to the expeditious and proper
administration of his official functions.
24. Business promotions and solicitations for charity.
He
should
avoid
giving
ground
for
any
reasonable
suspicion that in utilizing the power or prestige of his
office to persuade or coerce others to patronize or
contribute, either to the success of private business
ventures,
or
to
charitable
enterprises.
He
should,
therefore, not enter into such private business, or pursue
such a course of conduct, as would justify such suspicion,
nor use the power of his office or the influence of his
name to promote the business interest of others; he
should not solicit for charities, nor should he enter into
any business relation which, in the normal course of
events
reasonably
to
be
expected,
might
bring his
personal
interests
into
conflict
with
the
impartial
performance of his official duties.
25. Personal investments and relations
A
Judge
should
abstain
from
making
personal
investments in enterprises which are apt to be involved in
litigation in his court; and, after accession to the bench,
he should not retain such investments previously made,
longer than a period sufficient to enable him to dispose
of them without serious loss. It is desirable that he should,
so far as reasonably possible, refrain from all relations
which would normally tend to arouse the suspicion that
such relations warp or bias his judgment, or prevent his
impartial attitude of mind in the administration of his
judicial duties.
It is highly improper for a judge to utilize information
coming to him in a juridical capacity for purposes of
speculation and it detracts from the public confidence in
his integrity and the soundness of judicial judgment for
him at any time to become a speculative investor upon
the hazard of a margin.
26. Executorships and trusteeships
While
judges
are
not
disqualified
from
holding
executorships or trusteeships, they should not accept or
continue to hold any fiduciary or other position if the
holding of it would interfere or seem to interfere with the
proper performance of their judicial duties, or if the
business
interests
of
those
represented
require
investments in enterprises that are apt to come before
the court, or to be involved in questions of law to be
determined by it.
27. Partisan politics
While entitled to entertain his personal view on political
questions, and while not required to surrender his rights
or opinions as a citizen, it is inevitable that suspicion of
being warped by political bias will attach to a judge who
becomes the active promoter of the interests of one
political party against another.
A
Judge
should
avoid
making
political
speeches,
contributions to party funds, the public endorsement of
candidates for political office, or participating in party
conventions.
28. Self-interest
He should abstain from participating in any judicial act in
which
his personal interests are involved. If he has
personal litigation in the court of which he is judge, he
need not resign his judgeship on that account, but he
should, of course, refrain from any judicial act in such a
controversy.
29. Gifts and favors
He should not accept any presents or favors from litigants
or from lawyers practicing before him.
30. Social relations
It is not necessary to the proper performance of judicial
duty that judges should live in retirement or seclusion; it
is desirable that, so far as the reasonable attention to the
completion of their work will permit, they continue to
mingle in social intercourse, and that they should not
discontinue their interests in or appearance at meetings
of members of the bar. A judge should, however, in
pending
or
prospective
litigation
before
him
be
scrupulously
careful
to
avoid
such
action
as
may
reasonably tend to waken the suspicion that his social or
© Compiled By RGL
7 of 41
Use With Care
Definitions and exceptions often appear before or after this text.
Court decisions may interpret, limit, or apply this provision.
Confirm amendment, repeal, effectivity, and official publication.