National Internal Revenue Code
National Internal Revenue Code
Answer First
Primary Text
NATIONAL INTERNAL REVENUE CODE TAXATION, TARIFF and CUSTOMS LAWS
(a) In all cases falling within the original jurisdiction of the
Court in Division pursuant to Section 3, Rule 4 of these
Rules; and
(b) In appeals in both civil and criminal cases where the
Court grants a new trial pursuant to Section 2, Rule 53
and Section 12, Rule 124 of the Rules of Court.
(n)
SEC. 3. Taking of evidence by a justice. – The Court may,
motu proprio or upon proper motion, direct that a case,
or any issue therein, be assigned to one of its members
for the taking of evidence, when the determination of a
question of fact arises at any stage of the proceedings, or
when the taking of an account is necessary, or when the
determination
of
an
issue
of
fact
requires
the
examination of a long account. The hearing before such
justice shall proceed in all respects as though the same
had been made before the Court.
Upon
the
completion
of
such
hearing,
the
justice
concerned shall promptly submit to the Court a written
report
thereon,
stating
therein
his
findings
and
conclusions. Thereafter, the Court shall render its decision
on the case, adopting, modifying, or rejecting the report
in whole or in part, or, the Court may, in its discretion,
recommit it to the justice with instructions, or receive
further evidence.
(n)
SEC. 4. Taking of evidence by Court official. – In default or
ex parte hearings, or in any case where the parties agree
in writing, the Court may delegate the reception of
evidence to the Clerk of Court, the Division Clerks of
Court, their assistants who are members of the Philippine
bar, or any Court attorney. The reception of documentary
evidence by a Court official shall be for the sole purpose
of
marking,
comparison
with
the
original,
and
identification
by
witnesses
of
such
documentary
evidence. The Court official shall have no power to rule on
objections to any question or to the admission of exhibits,
which objections shall be resolved by the Court upon
submission of his report and the transcripts within ten
days from termination of the hearing. (Rules of Court,
Rule 30, sec. 9a)
SEC. 5. Presentation of voluminous documents or long
accounts. – In the interest of speedy administration of
justice, the following rules shall govern the presentation
of voluminous documents or long accounts, such as
receipts, invoices and vouchers, as evidence to establish
certain facts:
(a) Summary and CPA certification. – The party who
desires
to
introduce
in
evidence
such
voluminous
documents or long accounts must, upon motion and
approval by the Court, refer the voluminous documents
to an independent Certified Public Accountant (CPA) for
the purpose of presenting:
(1)
a
summary
containing,
among
other matters, a
chronological listing of the numbers, dates and amounts
covered by the invoices or receipts and the amount(s) of
taxes paid and
(2) a certification of an independent CPA attesting to the
correctness of the contents of the summary after making
an examination, evaluation and audit of voluminous
receipts, invoices or long accounts.
The name of the Certified Public Accountant or partner of
a professional partnership of certified public accountants
in charge must be stated in the motion. The Court shall
issue a commission authorizing him to conduct an audit
and, thereafter, testify relative to such summary and
certification.
(b) Pre-marking and availability of originals. – The receipts,
invoices, vouchers or other documents covering the said
accounts or payment to be introduced in evidence must
be pre-marked by the party concerned and submitted to
the Court in order to be made accessible to the adverse
party who desires to check and verify the correctness of
the summary and CPA certification. The original copies of
the voluminous receipts, invoices or accounts must be
ready for verification and comparison in case doubt on its
authenticity is raised during the hearing or resolution of
the formal offer of evidence. (n)
RULE 13 TRIAL BY COMMISSIONER
SECTION 1. Appointment of independent Certified Public
Accountant
(CPA).
–
A
party
desiring
to
present
voluminous documents in evidence before the Court may
secure the services of an independent certified Public
Accountant (CPA) at its own expense. The Court shall
commission the latter as an officer of the Court solely for
the purpose of performing such audit functions as the
Court may direct. (n)
SEC. 2. Duties of independent CPA. – The independent
CPA shall perform audit functions in accordance with the
generally
accepted
accounting
principles,
rules
and
regulations, which shall include:
(a) Examination and verification of receipts, invoices,
vouchers and other long accounts;
(b)
Reproduction
of,
and
comparison
of
such
reproduction with, and certification that the same are
faithful copies of original documents, and pre-marking of
documentary
exhibits
consisting
of
voluminous
documents;
(c) Preparation of schedules or summaries containing a
chronological listing of the numbers, dates and amounts
covered
by
receipts
or
invoices
or
other
relevant
documents and the amount(s) of taxes paid;
(d) Making findings as to compliance with substantiation
requirements under pertinent tax laws, regulations and
jurisprudence;
(e) Submission of a formal report with certification of
authenticity and veracity of findings and conclusions in
the performance of the audit;
(f) Testifying on such formal report; and
(g) Performing such other functions as the Court may
direct.
SEC. 3. Findings of independent CPA. – The submission
by the independent CPA of pre-marked documentary
exhibits shall be subject to verification and comparison
with the original documents, the availability of which
shall be the primary responsibility of the party possessing
such documents and, secondarily, by the independent
CPA. The findings and conclusions of the independent
CPA may be challenged by the parties and shall not be
conclusive upon the Court, which may, in whole or in part,
adopt
such
findings
and
conclusions
subject
to
verification. (n)
SEC. 4. Other referral to commissioner. – Whenever
practicable and convenient, the Court may apply the
procedure prescribed in Rule 32 of the Rules of Court.
When
the
parties
stipulate
that
a
commissioner’s
findings of fact shall be final, only questions of law shall
thereafter be considered. (n)
SEC. 5. Compensation of Commissioner. – The Court shall
allow the commissioners such reasonable compensation
as the circumstances of the case may warrant. (Rules of
Court, Rule 32, sec. 13a)
RULE 14 JUDGMENT, ITS ENTRY AND
EXECUTION
SECTION 1. Rendition of judgment. – The Court shall
decide the cases brought before it in accordance with
Section
15,
paragraph
(1),
Article
VIII
of
the
1987
Constitution.
The
conclusions
of
the
Court shall be
reached in consultation by the Members on the merits of
the case before its assignment to a Member for the
writing of the decision. The presiding justice or chairman
of the Division shall include the case in an agenda for a
meeting of the Court en banc or in Division, as the case
may be, for its deliberation. If a majority of the justices of
the Court en banc or in Division agree on the draft
© Compiled by RGL
160 of 201
Use With Care
Definitions and exceptions often appear before or after this text.
Court decisions may interpret, limit, or apply this provision.
Confirm amendment, repeal, effectivity, and official publication.
Plain Language